Random Thoughts

                                                              #Change in Judiciary Isn't it for the best to have a jury, a broad-minded decision-maker in the court of law? The constitutional rights and future lives of thousands of people are put at stake and are given away many times because of a decision influenced by the stereotypical thought structure of that one judge or the that small panel of judges. The decision they make may be biased whereas jurors will be from different walks of life and their final decision depends not on one juror but on the entire jury. India needs the normal, uninfluenced crowd to make decisions. They all have different viewpoints and the decision of each juror depends on his experience and how he sees the issue. Any citizen can be called to serve his nation as a juror and force his opinions down in an official court case. Jurors will have more integrity and fairness compared to the stereotypical decisions of a judge. For a judge it is just another

                                                      The Endless Race of Life We are all following this dream aren't we ? One with money innumerable and the passion to work harder just for that. Trying to increase your salary even if you have crossed the extent of success, even if you can't do more. You push yourself until you fall. Is this the right way ? Life is short and what should we do in this time that flies away so fast ? Should we try to cross all limits of success or just cherish the small, peaceful moments of life. Is it just human nature to talk beyond each other's backs, trying to fire someone to come ahead of him or her just for that promotion. Or is it a habit imbibed by you from the environment around ? Is there any limit to success ? That largely depends on how you measure it, that is by success or happiness.  Everybody is told to stop playing the children's game at some point of time. Some are told at 15, some are at 40, some are also told at 80.Those